Important Stuff

Grading Criteria

Leeds MET Grading CriteriaLeeds Met grading criteria are set out below. These are the same for all modules. Excellent Outcome: 70% + Most of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Excellent grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Good integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. Above Average Outcome: 60-69% Most of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Good grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Good integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. Average Outcome: 50-59% Much of the relevant information/skills mostly accurately deployed. Adequate grasp of the theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Fair integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. Satisfactory Outcome: 40-49% No major omissions or inaccuracies in the deployment of information/skills. Some grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Integration of theory/practice/information present intermittently in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. Unsatisfactory Outcome: 30-39% Knowledge and understanding at limited level; may be errors both in terms of factual knowledge and understanding; expression of ideas not always clear, and argument/discussion weakly structured. Unsatisfactory Outcome: 15-29% Knowledge and understanding at limited level shown by significant errors and/or omissions both in terms of factual knowledge and understanding, with tendency to description rather than analysis; may include inability to express ideas clearly, lack of coherence in terms of structure, inclusion of irrelevant material. Unsatisfactory Outcome: below 15% Overall lack of relevant information, descriptive not analytical; may also be repetitive, lack organisation, demonstrate inadequate use of language and inability to construct sentences